Quote:
|
Originally Posted by asphalt
Thanks for the reply! Ya, not worried about redundancy thats why I currently have my OS installed on a independant but slower PATA drive and the server files installed on my 2 SATA 150's in RAID 0 array. Guess what I was after was if installing the OS and the server on the RAID array would give me better performance than my current config. Dont have any extra SATA drives or an add-in RAID controller for RAID 1 or 5 setups.
|
I don't think you have redunancy here - you lose one drive (either OS or 1 striped SATA) and you are out of business. Either way it doesn't sound like you are going for uptime.
Are you doing hardware RAID or striping in Windows? If the latter, I would not suggest putting the OS on the RAID set because it's more hassle than it's worth.
Your performance will be greater impacted by RAM and CPU vs. disk. The only time your server is going to disk is to load maps, configuration info, etc. so RAID will speed those things up. If you are low on RAM, try to upgrade. If upgrading RAM is cost prohibitive, put your page file on the Sata RAID 0 you created so you get some performance benefit when Windows pages to disk.
Always choose W2K3 over XP for anything I/O intensive (W2K3 is much better at disk/memory I/O than XP).
In reality we're not talking about running the stock market on this server so you will see minimal performance differences unless you are running on older hardware or you currently have a performance bottleneck.
Also there is a setting in Windows server to optimize the OS for applications running in the foreground or background (it's under the performance tab in your computer properties I believe). I think this defaults to background applications in Windows 2003. If you are not running COD4 as a service, change this to foreground.